This book chapter, contributed to Routledge’s Handbook, argues that the Euro-centric, rights-based ethics dominating AI governance cannot answer manipulation carried out at machine precision, and it builds an alternative framework from the Yoga-Vashishtha that rests on individual resilience rather than on external constraint alone.

The article argues that the central failure in AI regulation is one of vision rather than of law, because regulators apply familiar categories to systems that conceal exploitative architectures, and it offers categorical scepticism, functional classification and pre-emptive scrutiny as correctives.

The research article published in the International Review of Law, Computers and Technology (IRLCT),  examines the evolving cybercrime landscape and the challenges posed by AI-driven threats. It explores comparative regulatory approaches and the need for resilient cybergovernance frameworks.

The chapter, contributed to IGI 91ÊÓƵ’s Law and Regulation of AI, Blockchain, and Digital Rights, asks whether an arbitration clause written into code amounts to an arbitration agreement at all, and it works through the jurisdictional obstacles, public policy objections and regulatory gaps that stand between smart contracts and a workable regime for resolving disputes about them.